Constitutional Chess
From American Thinker
Since the of “The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937″ (and the attempted “packing” of the Supreme Court by FDR) the rules of interpreting the Constitution have been rigged to support a progressive ideology. The Constitution has become “a living document.” The Constitution means either whatever the Congress wants it to mean or whatever five out of the nine justices sitting on the Court at the present time say that it means.
Imagine that our Constitution is the equivalent of the rules of the game of chess. How would the modern Supreme Court and our progressive Congress conduct a chess tournament? How would they interpret the rules of the game? In making this comparison, I hope to demonstrate the inanity of modern constitutional interpretation, and to portray the legislative abuses of the Constitution, since the late 1930s. Let the games begin.
Related posts:
- Are Federal Gun Laws Constitutional?
- The Militia: A Constitutional Defense Force
- Freedoms Destruction by Constitutional De-Construction
- Obama’s Executive Orders and the Constitutional Militia
- Obama Presidential Eligibility – An Introductory Primer
