Home > Current Events, Economics > The Case for Doing Nothing: The only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.

The Case for Doing Nothing: The only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.

The first thing to note about the financial crisis is that the federal government never had any business intervening in the personal decision of whether you want to own a home. There is no rational economic argument, or any argument I know of, that says the market of buying and selling homes is imperfect in some way, requiring government action. Construction firms have plenty of incentive to build homes and sell them. People who have the wherewithal have plenty of incentive to buy homes if they so choose. For the government to intrude into home ownership was an off-budget, nontransparent, backdoor attempt at redistributing income. And when the policy became a way of transferring income to people who couldn’t afford those homes, it was doomed to failure.

More…

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. 8 More Banks Close; Already 50 This Year
  2. Fannie-Freddie Fix at $160 Billion With $1 Trillion Worst Case
  3. My Argument For Drug Legalization in One Page or Less
  4. Consumer-driven Deflation? Not Even Close
  5. Kucinich: ‘Is the Fed paying banks not to loan money?’
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.